Agostini v. Felton

E180462

Agostini v. Felton is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court case that reshaped Establishment Clause doctrine by allowing public school teachers to provide remedial instruction in religious schools under certain safeguards.

All labels observed (3)

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (49)

Predicate Object
instanceOf Establishment Clause case ⓘ
United States Supreme Court case ⓘ
changedDoctrine Modified the Lemon test as applied to aid to religious schools ⓘ
Reduced emphasis on the concept of symbolic union between church and state in aid cases ⓘ
Relaxed the presumption that public employees in religious schools inevitably advance religion ⓘ
citation 117 S. Ct. 1997 ⓘ
138 L. Ed. 2d 391 ⓘ
521 U.S. 203 ⓘ
clauseInterpreted Establishment Clause ⓘ
constitutionalProvisionInterpreted First Amendment to the United States Constitution ⓘ
country United States ⓘ
court Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ
decisionDate 1997-06-23 ⓘ
dissentBy David H. Souter ⓘ
dissentJoinedBy John Paul Stevens ⓘ
Ruth Bader Ginsburg ⓘ
Stephen G. Breyer ⓘ
docketNumber 96-552 ⓘ
fullName Agostini, Superintendent of Schools of the Board of Education of the City of New York v. Felton ⓘ
linked to: Agostini v. Felton
holding Public school teachers may provide Title I remedial instruction in religious schools if safeguards prevent governmental indoctrination and excessive entanglement ⓘ
The Establishment Clause is not violated by sending public employees into religious schools to provide neutral, secular aid under appropriate safeguards ⓘ
impact Expanded permissible government aid to students in religious schools ⓘ
Signaled a shift toward greater accommodation of religion in Establishment Clause jurisprudence ⓘ
issue Whether public school teachers may provide remedial instruction at religious schools using public funds ⓘ
keyConcept Neutrality toward religion in distribution of public benefits ⓘ
No presumption of indoctrination from public employees in religious schools ⓘ
Safeguards against religious indoctrination and excessive entanglement ⓘ
legalSubject Constitutional law ⓘ
Establishment Clause ⓘ
First Amendment ⓘ
location New York City ⓘ
majorityJoinedBy Anthony M. Kennedy ⓘ
Antonin Scalia ⓘ
Clarence Thomas ⓘ
William H. Rehnquist ⓘ
majorityOpinionBy Sandra Day O'Connor ⓘ
overruledCase Aguilar v. Felton ⓘ
overruledCaseCitation 473 U.S. 402 ⓘ
party Agostini, Superintendent of Schools of the Board of Education of the City of New York ⓘ
Felton ⓘ
New York City Board of Education ⓘ
proceduralPosture Motion to vacate a permanent injunction issued after Aguilar v. Felton ⓘ
relatedProgram Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 ⓘ
subsequentCitationIn Mitchell v. Helms ⓘ
Zelman v. Simmons-Harris ⓘ
term October Term 1996 ⓘ
testApplied Lemon test ⓘ
testModified Lemon test effects prong ⓘ
yearDecided 1997 ⓘ

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (8)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Lemon v. Kurtzman → overruledOrLimitedBy → Agostini v. Felton ⓘ
Agostini v. Felton → fullName → Agostini, Superintendent of Schools of the Board of Education of the City of New York v. Felton ⓘ
linked to: Agostini v. Felton
Aguilar v. Felton → overruledBy → Agostini v. Felton ⓘ
Agostini, Superintendent of Schools of the Board of Education of the City of New York → namedGovernmentPartyIn → Agostini v. Felton, 521 U.S. 203 (1997) ⓘ
linked to: Agostini v. Felton
Felton → partyInCase → Agostini v. Felton ⓘ
Felton → mentionedIn → Agostini v. Felton, 521 U.S. 203 (1997) ⓘ
linked to: Agostini v. Felton
Mitchell v. Helms → relatedToCase → Agostini v. Felton ⓘ