NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware Co.

E179510

NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware Co. is a landmark 1982 U.S. Supreme Court case that held nonviolent civil rights boycotts and related advocacy are protected by the First Amendment.

All labels observed (3)

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (49)

Predicate Object
instanceOf First Amendment case ⓘ
United States Supreme Court case ⓘ
landmark civil rights case ⓘ
areaOfLaw First Amendment law ⓘ
civil rights law ⓘ
constitutional law ⓘ
arguedDate 1981-03-03 ⓘ
citation 458 U.S. 886 ⓘ
concurrenceBy William H. Rehnquist ⓘ
concurrenceInJudgment William H. Rehnquist ⓘ
court Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ
decisionDate 1982-07-02 ⓘ
docketNumber 81-202 ⓘ
factualBackground Local NAACP leaders organized a boycott of white merchants in Claiborne County, Mississippi, to protest racial discrimination. ⓘ
White merchants sued the NAACP and boycott leaders for damages allegedly caused by the boycott. ⓘ
fullCaseName National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. Claiborne Hardware Co. ⓘ
holding Liability for violence or threats may be imposed only on those who specifically authorized, directed, or ratified such conduct. ⓘ
Nonviolent boycotts to effectuate political, social, and economic change are protected by the First Amendment. ⓘ
Speech, assembly, association, and petition rights protect organizers and participants in nonviolent civil rights boycotts. ⓘ
States may not impose liability for damages on participants in a nonviolent political boycott based on the boycott’s effects on business. ⓘ
issue whether a nonviolent civil rights boycott is protected by the First Amendment ⓘ
joinedByInMajority Byron R. White ⓘ
Harry A. Blackmun ⓘ
Lewis F. Powell Jr. ⓘ
Potter Stewart ⓘ
Thurgood Marshall ⓘ
Warren E. Burger ⓘ
William J. Brennan Jr. ⓘ
jurisdiction United States ⓘ
legalPrinciple First Amendment protection for politically motivated consumer boycotts ⓘ
heightened protection for expressive conduct in the context of civil rights advocacy ⓘ
limits on state tort liability when it burdens protected political expression ⓘ
locationOfEvents Claiborne County, Mississippi ⓘ
majorityOpinionBy John Paul Stevens ⓘ
originatingStateCourt Mississippi Supreme Court ⓘ
page 886 ⓘ
parties Charles Evers ⓘ
Claiborne Hardware Company ⓘ
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People ⓘ
linked to: NAACP
proceduralPosture appeal from the Supreme Court of Mississippi ⓘ
rearguedDate 1981-10-07 ⓘ
relatedConcept freedom of assembly ⓘ
freedom of association ⓘ
freedom of speech ⓘ
political boycott ⓘ
relatedMovement civil rights movement in the United States ⓘ
reporter United States Reports ⓘ
volume 458 ⓘ
yearDecided 1982 ⓘ

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (4)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Brandenburg v. Ohio → subsequentCitationBy → NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware Co. ⓘ
NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware Co. → fullCaseName → National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. Claiborne Hardware Co. ⓘ
linked to: NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware Co.
NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware Co. → factualBackground → Local NAACP leaders organized a boycott of white merchants in Claiborne County, Mississippi, to protest racial discrimination. ⓘ
linked to: NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware Co.
Claiborne Hardware Company → partyTo → NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware Co. ⓘ