Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri
E176641
Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri is a 2011 U.S. Supreme Court case that held public employees’ lawsuits and grievances are protected by the Petition Clause only when they address matters of public concern.
All labels observed (3)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri canonical | 4 |
| Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri, 564 U.S. 379 (2011) | 1 |
| Borough of Duryea, Pennsylvania v. Guarnieri | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T1538895 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri Context triple: [Petition Clause, citedInCase, Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri]
-
A.
Fulton v. City of Philadelphia
Fulton v. City of Philadelphia is a 2021 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court unanimously ruled that Philadelphia violated a Catholic foster care agency’s religious freedom by excluding it from the foster program over its refusal to certify same-sex couples.
-
B.
Grovey v. Townsend
Grovey v. Townsend was a 1935 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the Texas Democratic Party’s whites-only primary rule, later repudiated as unconstitutional racial discrimination in voting.
-
C.
Romer v. Evans
Romer v. Evans is a 1996 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a Colorado constitutional amendment targeting gay, lesbian, and bisexual people as a violation of the Equal Protection Clause.
-
D.
United States v. Darby
United States v. Darby is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal labor regulations under the Commerce Clause and marked a broad expansion of federal power over economic activity.
-
E.
Argersinger v. Hamlin
Argersinger v. Hamlin is a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that extended the right to counsel to defendants in misdemeanor cases that may result in imprisonment.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri Target entity description: Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri is a 2011 U.S. Supreme Court case that held public employees’ lawsuits and grievances are protected by the Petition Clause only when they address matters of public concern.
-
A.
Fulton v. City of Philadelphia
Fulton v. City of Philadelphia is a 2021 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court unanimously ruled that Philadelphia violated a Catholic foster care agency’s religious freedom by excluding it from the foster program over its refusal to certify same-sex couples.
-
B.
Grovey v. Townsend
Grovey v. Townsend was a 1935 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the Texas Democratic Party’s whites-only primary rule, later repudiated as unconstitutional racial discrimination in voting.
-
C.
Romer v. Evans
Romer v. Evans is a 1996 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a Colorado constitutional amendment targeting gay, lesbian, and bisexual people as a violation of the Equal Protection Clause.
-
D.
United States v. Darby
United States v. Darby is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal labor regulations under the Commerce Clause and marked a broad expansion of federal power over economic activity.
-
E.
Argersinger v. Hamlin
Argersinger v. Hamlin is a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that extended the right to counsel to defendants in misdemeanor cases that may result in imprisonment.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (48)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
First Amendment case
ⓘ
U.S. constitutional law case ⓘ United States Supreme Court case ⓘ |
| areaOfLaw |
Section 1983 actions
ⓘ
civil rights litigation ⓘ public employment law ⓘ |
| arguedDate | 2011-03-22 ⓘ |
| citation | 564 U.S. 379 ⓘ |
| clauseInterpreted |
Petition Clause of the First Amendment
ⓘ
linked to:
Petition Clause
|
| concurrenceBy |
Justice Antonin Scalia
ⓘ
linked to:
Antonin Scalia
Justice Clarence Thomas ⓘ
linked to:
Clarence Thomas
|
| concurrenceInJudgmentBy |
Justice Elena Kagan
ⓘ
linked to:
Elena Kagan
|
| constitutionalProvisionInterpreted | First Amendment to the United States Constitution ⓘ |
| court | Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ |
| decisionDate | 2011-06-20 ⓘ |
| docketNumber | 09-1476 ⓘ |
| fullName |
Borough of Duryea, Pennsylvania v. Guarnieri
ⓘ
linked to:
Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri
|
| geographicalContext | Borough of Duryea, Pennsylvania ⓘ |
| holding |
Public employees’ lawsuits and formal grievances are protected by the Petition Clause only when they address matters of public concern.
ⓘ
The public concern test applies to public employees’ claims under the Petition Clause. ⓘ The same public concern requirement that limits public employee speech claims also limits Petition Clause claims. ⓘ |
| joinedByInMajority |
Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr.
ⓘ
linked to:
John G. Roberts Jr.
Justice Antonin Scalia ⓘ
linked to:
Antonin Scalia
Justice Clarence Thomas ⓘ
linked to:
Clarence Thomas
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg ⓘ
linked to:
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr. ⓘ
linked to:
Samuel A. Alito Jr.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor ⓘ
linked to:
Sonia Sotomayor
Justice Stephen G. Breyer ⓘ
linked to:
Stephen G. Breyer
|
| jurisdictionBasis | federal question jurisdiction ⓘ |
| legalIssue | scope of public employees’ protection under the Petition Clause ⓘ |
| lowerCourtDisposition | judgment for Guarnieri affirmed in part and vacated in part ⓘ |
| majorityOpinionBy |
Justice Anthony M. Kennedy
ⓘ
linked to:
Anthony M. Kennedy
|
| originatingCourt | United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit ⓘ |
| page | 379 ⓘ |
| petitioner | Borough of Duryea, Pennsylvania ⓘ |
| relatedCase |
Connick v. Myers
ⓘ
Garcetti v. Ceballos ⓘ Pickering v. Board of Education ⓘ |
| relatedDoctrine |
Pickering balancing test
ⓘ
public concern test ⓘ |
| remedyIssue | availability of damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for Petition Clause violations ⓘ |
| reporter | United States Reports ⓘ |
| respondent | Charles J. Guarnieri ⓘ |
| subjectMatter | retaliation against a police chief for filing grievances and a lawsuit ⓘ |
| volume | 564 ⓘ |
| voteMajority | 8 ⓘ |
| voteMinority | 1 ⓘ |
| yearDecided | 2011 ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri Description of subject: Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri is a 2011 U.S. Supreme Court case that held public employees’ lawsuits and grievances are protected by the Petition Clause only when they address matters of public concern.
Referenced by (6)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.
linked to: Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri
Borough of Duryea, Pennsylvania
→
caseCitation
→
Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri, 564 U.S. 379 (2011)
ⓘ
linked to: Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri