New York Times Co. v. Sullivan

E166646

New York Times Co. v. Sullivan is a landmark 1964 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the “actual malice” standard, greatly expanding First Amendment protections for the press in defamation cases involving public officials.

All labels observed (2)

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (48)

Predicate Object
instanceOf United States Supreme Court case ⓘ
defamation case ⓘ
landmark First Amendment case ⓘ
appliesTo public officials ⓘ
arguedDate 1964-01-06 ⓘ
citation 376 U.S. 254 ⓘ
concurrenceBy Arthur J. Goldberg ⓘ
Hugo L. Black ⓘ
William O. Douglas ⓘ
constitutionalProvisionAppliedThrough Fourteenth Amendment ⓘ
constitutionalProvisionInterpreted First Amendment to the United States Constitution ⓘ
court Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ
decisionDate 1964-03-09 ⓘ
definedTerm actual malice is knowledge that a statement was false or reckless disregard of whether it was false or not. ⓘ
effect made it harder for public officials to win libel suits in the United States ⓘ
establishedStandard actual malice ⓘ
expandedProtectionFor press ⓘ
speech criticizing public officials ⓘ
holding A public official cannot recover damages for a defamatory falsehood relating to official conduct unless the official proves the statement was made with actual malice. ⓘ
The First Amendment limits a state’s power to award damages in libel actions brought by public officials against critics of their official conduct. ⓘ
involvedAdvertisement Heed Their Rising Voices ⓘ
involvedPublication The New York Times ⓘ
joinedByInMajority Byron R. White ⓘ
Earl Warren ⓘ
Hugo L. Black ⓘ
John M. Harlan II ⓘ
Potter Stewart ⓘ
Tom C. Clark ⓘ
William O. Douglas ⓘ
jurisdiction United States ⓘ
laterExtendedTo public figures ⓘ
legalSubject First Amendment ⓘ
constitutional law ⓘ
defamation law ⓘ
freedom of the press ⓘ
majorityOpinionBy William J. Brennan Jr. ⓘ
originatingCourt Supreme Court of Alabama ⓘ
page 254 ⓘ
petitioner The New York Times Company ⓘ
rearguedDate 1964-01-07 ⓘ
recognizedPrinciple debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open. ⓘ
relatedTo civil rights movement ⓘ
criticism of police conduct in Montgomery, Alabama ⓘ
reporter United States Reports ⓘ
respondent L. B. Sullivan ⓘ
stateLawAtIssue Alabama libel law ⓘ
volume 376 ⓘ
yearDecided 1964 ⓘ

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (7)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

William J. Brennan Jr. → notableWork → New York Times Co. v. Sullivan ⓘ
subject linked to: Brennan
United States Supreme Court cases → hasPart → New York Times Co. v. Sullivan ⓘ
Warren Court era → notableCase → New York Times Co. v. Sullivan ⓘ
Heed Their Rising Voices → centralTo → New York Times Co. v. Sullivan ⓘ
Heed Their Rising Voices → relatedWork → New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964 Supreme Court decision) ⓘ
linked to: New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
L. B. Sullivan → notableCourtCase → New York Times Co. v. Sullivan ⓘ