Clinton v. Jones

E15619

Clinton v. Jones is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a sitting president is not immune from civil litigation for unofficial acts committed before taking office.

AI illustration

How this image was made

AI-generated illustration of Clinton v. Jones

This AI-generated illustration was produced by black-forest-labs/FLUX.2-dev (1024x1024) from a prompt written by openai/gpt-oss-120b from the entity's label + description.

Prompt

Generate an image of Clinton v. Jones (Clinton v. Jones is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a sitting president is not immune from civil litigation for unofficial acts committed before taking office.)

All labels observed (5)

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (45)

Predicate Object
instanceOf United States Supreme Court case ⓘ
legal case ⓘ
allegedConductTimePeriod before Bill Clinton became President of the United States ⓘ
areaOfLaw civil procedure ⓘ
constitutional law ⓘ
separation of powers ⓘ
citation 520 U.S. 681 ⓘ
constitutionalProvisionDiscussed Article II of the United States Constitution ⓘ
separation of powers doctrine ⓘ
country United States ⓘ
court Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ
decisionDate 1997-05-27 ⓘ
decisionType unanimous decision ⓘ
docketNumber 95-1853 ⓘ
effect Allowed Paula Jones's civil lawsuit against President Clinton to proceed while he was in office. ⓘ
fullCaseName William Jefferson Clinton, President of the United States, petitioner v. Paula Corbin Jones ⓘ
linked to: Clinton v. Jones
holding A sitting President of the United States has no immunity from civil litigation in federal court for unofficial acts alleged to have occurred before taking office. ⓘ
The Constitution does not require federal courts to stay all private civil lawsuits against the President until he leaves office. ⓘ
impact Clarified limits of presidential immunity from civil litigation. ⓘ
issue Scope of presidential immunity from civil suits for unofficial conduct ⓘ
jurisdiction federal question jurisdiction ⓘ
justiceInMajority Anthony M. Kennedy ⓘ
Antonin Scalia ⓘ
Clarence Thomas ⓘ
David H. Souter ⓘ
John Paul Stevens ⓘ
Ruth Bader Ginsburg ⓘ
Sandra Day O'Connor ⓘ
Stephen G. Breyer ⓘ
William H. Rehnquist ⓘ
legalPrinciple Presidential immunity is limited to official acts within the outer perimeter of presidential duties. ⓘ
Separation of powers does not require federal courts to stay private civil actions against a sitting President for unofficial conduct. ⓘ
majorityOpinionBy John Paul Stevens ⓘ
oralArgumentDate 1997-01-13 ⓘ
originatingCourt United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas ⓘ
petitioner William Jefferson Clinton ⓘ
linked to: Bill Clinton
presidentInvolved Bill Clinton ⓘ
priorCaseReferenced Nixon v. Fitzgerald ⓘ
proceduralHistory District court denied motion to dismiss but ordered stay; Eighth Circuit reversed stay; Supreme Court affirmed Eighth Circuit. ⓘ
respondent Paula Corbin Jones ⓘ
result Judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed. ⓘ
subjectMatter civil liability of a sitting President ⓘ
presidential immunity ⓘ
vote 9-0 ⓘ
yearDecided 1997 ⓘ

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (11)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

United States v. Nixon → citedBy → Clinton v. Jones ⓘ
Clinton v. Jones → fullCaseName → William Jefferson Clinton, President of the United States, petitioner v. Paula Corbin Jones ⓘ
linked to: Clinton v. Jones
Monica Lewinsky scandal → relatedTo → Paula Jones lawsuit ⓘ
linked to: Clinton v. Jones
Nixon v. Fitzgerald → relatedTo → Clinton v. Jones ⓘ
Paula Corbin Jones → notableEvent → Clinton v. Jones ⓘ
Paula Corbin Jones → participantIn → Clinton v. Jones ⓘ
Paula Corbin Jones → legalAction → Clinton v. Jones ⓘ
Paula Corbin Jones → significantCourtDecision → Clinton v. Jones decision ⓘ
linked to: Clinton v. Jones
Paula Rosalee Corbin → notableEvent → Paula Jones v. William Jefferson Clinton ⓘ
linked to: Clinton v. Jones