Albertsons, Inc. v. Kirkingburg
E1548467
UNEXPLORED
Albertsons, Inc. v. Kirkingburg is a 1999 U.S. Supreme Court case interpreting the Americans with Disabilities Act, particularly the definition of disability and employers’ obligations regarding safety-based job qualifications.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Albertsons, Inc. v. Kirkingburg canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T22674899 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Albertsons, Inc. v. Kirkingburg Context triple: [Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc., relatedCase, Albertsons, Inc. v. Kirkingburg]
-
A.
United States v. Quality Stores, Inc.
United States v. Quality Stores, Inc. is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that held severance payments to employees are taxable wages for purposes of Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA) taxes.
-
B.
International Shoe Co. v. Washington
International Shoe Co. v. Washington is a landmark 1945 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the modern "minimum contacts" standard for determining when a state may exercise personal jurisdiction over an out-of-state defendant.
-
C.
Whitley v. Albers
Whitley v. Albers is a 1986 U.S. Supreme Court decision that set the standard for evaluating prison officials’ use of force under the Eighth Amendment, focusing on whether force was applied in a good-faith effort to maintain or restore discipline or maliciously and sadistically to cause harm.
-
D.
Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins
Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins is a landmark 1980 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that states may grant broader free speech rights in private shopping centers under their own constitutions than those guaranteed by the federal Constitution.
-
E.
Ogden v. Saunders
Ogden v. Saunders is an 1827 U.S. Supreme Court case, known for Justice Bushrod Washington’s opinion addressing the constitutionality of state bankruptcy laws under the Contract Clause.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Albertsons, Inc. v. Kirkingburg Target entity description: Albertsons, Inc. v. Kirkingburg is a 1999 U.S. Supreme Court case interpreting the Americans with Disabilities Act, particularly the definition of disability and employers’ obligations regarding safety-based job qualifications.
-
A.
United States v. Quality Stores, Inc.
United States v. Quality Stores, Inc. is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that held severance payments to employees are taxable wages for purposes of Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA) taxes.
-
B.
International Shoe Co. v. Washington
International Shoe Co. v. Washington is a landmark 1945 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the modern "minimum contacts" standard for determining when a state may exercise personal jurisdiction over an out-of-state defendant.
-
C.
Whitley v. Albers
Whitley v. Albers is a 1986 U.S. Supreme Court decision that set the standard for evaluating prison officials’ use of force under the Eighth Amendment, focusing on whether force was applied in a good-faith effort to maintain or restore discipline or maliciously and sadistically to cause harm.
-
D.
Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins
Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins is a landmark 1980 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that states may grant broader free speech rights in private shopping centers under their own constitutions than those guaranteed by the federal Constitution.
-
E.
Ogden v. Saunders
Ogden v. Saunders is an 1827 U.S. Supreme Court case, known for Justice Bushrod Washington’s opinion addressing the constitutionality of state bankruptcy laws under the Contract Clause.
- F. None of above. chosen
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.