American Insurance Assn. v. Garamendi
E13962
American Insurance Assn. v. Garamendi is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a California law requiring disclosure of Holocaust-era insurance policies was preempted by the federal government's foreign affairs power.
All labels observed (4)
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T125868 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: American Insurance Assn. v. Garamendi Context triple: [Crosby v. National Foreign Trade Council, relatedCase, American Insurance Assn. v. Garamendi]
-
A.
Chiafalo v. Washington
Chiafalo v. Washington is a 2020 U.S. Supreme Court case that unanimously upheld states’ authority to penalize or replace “faithless electors” who do not vote in line with their state’s popular vote in presidential elections.
-
B.
Briggs v. Elliott
Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
-
C.
Gonzales v. Raich
Gonzales v. Raich is a 2005 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal power to prohibit local cultivation and use of marijuana under the Commerce Clause, even when states permit it for medical purposes.
-
D.
United States v. Darby
United States v. Darby is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal labor regulations under the Commerce Clause and marked a broad expansion of federal power over economic activity.
-
E.
United States v. Comstock
United States v. Comstock is a 2010 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s authority to civilly commit mentally ill, sexually dangerous federal prisoners beyond their release date under the Constitution’s Necessary and Proper Clause.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: American Insurance Assn. v. Garamendi Target entity description: American Insurance Assn. v. Garamendi is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a California law requiring disclosure of Holocaust-era insurance policies was preempted by the federal government's foreign affairs power.
-
A.
Chiafalo v. Washington
Chiafalo v. Washington is a 2020 U.S. Supreme Court case that unanimously upheld states’ authority to penalize or replace “faithless electors” who do not vote in line with their state’s popular vote in presidential elections.
-
B.
Briggs v. Elliott
Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
-
C.
Gonzales v. Raich
Gonzales v. Raich is a 2005 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal power to prohibit local cultivation and use of marijuana under the Commerce Clause, even when states permit it for medical purposes.
-
D.
United States v. Darby
United States v. Darby is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal labor regulations under the Commerce Clause and marked a broad expansion of federal power over economic activity.
-
E.
United States v. Comstock
United States v. Comstock is a 2010 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s authority to civilly commit mentally ill, sexually dangerous federal prisoners beyond their release date under the Constitution’s Necessary and Proper Clause.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (44)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
United States Supreme Court case
ⓘ
legal case ⓘ |
| affects | state regulation of international insurance matters ⓘ |
| areaOfLaw |
constitutional law
ⓘ
federalism ⓘ foreign relations law ⓘ |
| citation | 539 U.S. 396 ⓘ |
| citedFor | doctrine that state laws are preempted when they conflict with the President’s foreign policy ⓘ |
| decisionDate | 2003-06-23 ⓘ |
| dissentingJoiner |
Antonin Scalia
ⓘ
John Paul Stevens ⓘ Stephen G. Breyer ⓘ |
| dissentingOpinionBy | Ruth Bader Ginsburg ⓘ |
| docketNumber | 02-722 ⓘ |
| fullCaseName |
American Insurance Association et al. v. John Garamendi, Insurance Commissioner of the State of California
ⓘ
linked to:
American Insurance Assn. v. Garamendi
|
| hasCountry |
United States
ⓘ
linked to:
United States of America
|
| hasCourt | Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ |
| holding |
California Holocaust Victim Insurance Relief Act was preempted by the federal foreign affairs power
ⓘ
linked to:
American Insurance Assn. v. Garamendi
State law that interferes with the federal government’s conduct of foreign relations is preempted ⓘ |
| involvesGovernmentalPower |
federal foreign affairs power
ⓘ
state police power ⓘ |
| jurisdiction | federal question jurisdiction ⓘ |
| legalIssue |
conflict between state law and federal foreign policy
ⓘ
dormant foreign affairs doctrine ⓘ federal preemption ⓘ foreign affairs power ⓘ |
| majorityJoiner |
Anthony M. Kennedy
ⓘ
Clarence Thomas ⓘ Sandra Day O'Connor ⓘ
linked to:
Sandra Day O’Connor
William H. Rehnquist ⓘ |
| majorityOpinionBy | David H. Souter ⓘ |
| originatingJurisdiction |
State of California
ⓘ
linked to:
California, United States
|
| petitioner | American Insurance Association ⓘ |
| precedentFor | limits on state involvement in foreign affairs ⓘ |
| relatedStatuteOrAct | Holocaust Victim Insurance Relief Act of 1999 ⓘ |
| relatedTo | executive agreements concerning Holocaust-era claims ⓘ |
| respondent | John Garamendi ⓘ |
| respondentOffice | Insurance Commissioner of California ⓘ |
| result | California statute invalidated ⓘ |
| stateLawAtIssue | California Holocaust Victim Insurance Relief Act (HVIRA) ⓘ |
| subjectMatter |
Holocaust-era insurance policies
ⓘ
disclosure of insurance information ⓘ |
| voteSplit | 5-4 ⓘ |
| yearDecided | 2003 ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: American Insurance Assn. v. Garamendi Description of subject: American Insurance Assn. v. Garamendi is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a California law requiring disclosure of Holocaust-era insurance policies was preempted by the federal government's foreign affairs power.
Referenced by (4)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.
American Insurance Assn. v. Garamendi
→
fullCaseName
→
American Insurance Association et al. v. John Garamendi, Insurance Commissioner of the State of California
ⓘ
linked to: American Insurance Assn. v. Garamendi
American Insurance Assn. v. Garamendi
→
holding
→
California Holocaust Victim Insurance Relief Act was preempted by the federal foreign affairs power
ⓘ
linked to: American Insurance Assn. v. Garamendi
linked to: American Insurance Assn. v. Garamendi