pragma-dialectics
E1041504
Pragma-dialectics is a theory of argumentation that views argumentative discourse as a critical discussion aimed at resolving differences of opinion through rational dialogue governed by explicit rules.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| pragma-dialectics canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T13455473 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: pragma-dialectics Context triple: [Toulmin model of argumentation, relatedTo, pragma-dialectics]
-
A.
Negative Dialectics
Negative Dialectics is a major work of critical philosophy by Theodor W. Adorno that challenges traditional notions of identity and systematic thought by emphasizing contradiction, non-identity, and the limits of conceptual thinking.
-
B.
Valences of the Dialectic
Valences of the Dialectic is a major theoretical work by Marxist critic Fredric Jameson that explores and reinterprets dialectical thinking across philosophy, politics, and cultural theory.
-
C.
Dialectica
Dialectica is a theological and philosophical treatise by John of Damascus that systematically presents and defends Christian doctrine using Aristotelian logic and categories.
-
D.
De dialectica
De dialectica is a medieval philosophical treatise on logic and language by Alcuin of York, influential in the development of Carolingian scholastic thought.
-
E.
Critique of Dialectical Reason
Critique of Dialectical Reason is a major philosophical work by Jean-Paul Sartre that attempts to reconcile existentialism with Marxism through an analysis of history, freedom, and social structures.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: pragma-dialectics Target entity description: Pragma-dialectics is a theory of argumentation that views argumentative discourse as a critical discussion aimed at resolving differences of opinion through rational dialogue governed by explicit rules.
-
A.
Negative Dialectics
Negative Dialectics is a major work of critical philosophy by Theodor W. Adorno that challenges traditional notions of identity and systematic thought by emphasizing contradiction, non-identity, and the limits of conceptual thinking.
-
B.
Valences of the Dialectic
Valences of the Dialectic is a major theoretical work by Marxist critic Fredric Jameson that explores and reinterprets dialectical thinking across philosophy, politics, and cultural theory.
-
C.
Dialectica
Dialectica is a theological and philosophical treatise by John of Damascus that systematically presents and defends Christian doctrine using Aristotelian logic and categories.
-
D.
De dialectica
De dialectica is a medieval philosophical treatise on logic and language by Alcuin of York, influential in the development of Carolingian scholastic thought.
-
E.
Critique of Dialectical Reason
Critique of Dialectical Reason is a major philosophical work by Jean-Paul Sartre that attempts to reconcile existentialism with Marxism through an analysis of history, freedom, and social structures.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (52)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
approach to argumentation
ⓘ
research program in argumentation theory ⓘ theory of argumentation ⓘ |
| aimsAt | resolution of differences of opinion ⓘ |
| appliesTo |
everyday argumentation
ⓘ
legal argumentation ⓘ political argumentation ⓘ scientific argumentation ⓘ |
| basedOn |
dialectics
ⓘ
pragmatics ⓘ |
| characterizedBy | rule-governed argumentative discourse ⓘ |
| combines |
dialectical perspective on critical discussion
ⓘ
pragmatic perspective on language use ⓘ |
| countryOfOrigin | Netherlands ⓘ |
| developedAt | University of Amsterdam ⓘ |
| developedBy |
Frans H. van Eemeren
ⓘ
Rob Grootendorst ⓘ |
| emphasizes |
procedural rules for discussion
ⓘ
rational dialogue ⓘ |
| field | argumentation theory ⓘ |
| focusesOn |
analysis of argumentative moves
ⓘ
evaluation of argumentative discourse ⓘ normative standards for argumentation ⓘ |
| goal | reasonable resolution of disputes ⓘ |
| hasStage |
argumentation stage
ⓘ
concluding stage ⓘ confrontation stage ⓘ opening stage ⓘ |
| influencedBy |
classical dialectic
ⓘ
informal logic ⓘ speech act theory ⓘ |
| interpretsFallaciesAs | violations of discussion rules ⓘ |
| introducesConcept |
critical discussion model
ⓘ
four stages of critical discussion ⓘ |
| language |
Dutch
ⓘ
English ⓘ |
| opposes |
purely formal-logical views of argumentation
ⓘ
purely rhetorical views of argumentation ⓘ |
| proposes | ten rules for critical discussion ⓘ |
| provides | normative model for argumentative discourse ⓘ |
| ruleType |
argument scheme rule
ⓘ
burden of proof rule ⓘ closure rule ⓘ freedom rule ⓘ relevance rule ⓘ standpoint rule ⓘ starting point rule ⓘ unexpressed premise rule ⓘ usage rule ⓘ validity rule ⓘ |
| usedFor | analyzing fallacies ⓘ |
| viewsArgumentationAs | critical discussion ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: pragma-dialectics Description of subject: Pragma-dialectics is a theory of argumentation that views argumentative discourse as a critical discussion aimed at resolving differences of opinion through rational dialogue governed by explicit rules.
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.