The Paradoxes of Legal Science
E100416
The Paradoxes of Legal Science is a 1928 jurisprudential treatise by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Benjamin N. Cardozo that explores the philosophical tensions and logical contradictions within legal reasoning and doctrine.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| The Paradoxes of Legal Science canonical | 3 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T841082 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: The Paradoxes of Legal Science Context triple: [Benjamin N. Cardozo, notableWork, The Paradoxes of Legal Science]
-
A.
Between Facts and Norms
Between Facts and Norms is a major work of political and legal philosophy by Jürgen Habermas that develops a theory of deliberative democracy and the legitimacy of law through communicative rationality.
-
B.
A Great and Good Law School
A Great and Good Law School is the guiding motto of the University of Virginia School of Law, reflecting its aspiration to combine academic excellence with a strong commitment to ethical and public service values.
-
C.
On Interpretation
On Interpretation is a foundational philosophical treatise by Aristotle that examines language, meaning, and the logical structure of propositions, laying groundwork for later logic and semantics.
-
D.
The Idea of Justice
The Idea of Justice is a philosophical work by Amartya Sen that critiques traditional theories of justice and proposes a comparative, realization-focused approach grounded in public reasoning and human capabilities.
-
E.
Law, Legislation and Liberty
Law, Legislation and Liberty is a three-volume work by economist and philosopher Friedrich Hayek that develops his theory of a liberal constitutional order grounded in the rule of law and spontaneous market processes.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: The Paradoxes of Legal Science Target entity description: The Paradoxes of Legal Science is a 1928 jurisprudential treatise by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Benjamin N. Cardozo that explores the philosophical tensions and logical contradictions within legal reasoning and doctrine.
-
A.
Between Facts and Norms
Between Facts and Norms is a major work of political and legal philosophy by Jürgen Habermas that develops a theory of deliberative democracy and the legitimacy of law through communicative rationality.
-
B.
A Great and Good Law School
A Great and Good Law School is the guiding motto of the University of Virginia School of Law, reflecting its aspiration to combine academic excellence with a strong commitment to ethical and public service values.
-
C.
On Interpretation
On Interpretation is a foundational philosophical treatise by Aristotle that examines language, meaning, and the logical structure of propositions, laying groundwork for later logic and semantics.
-
D.
The Idea of Justice
The Idea of Justice is a philosophical work by Amartya Sen that critiques traditional theories of justice and proposes a comparative, realization-focused approach grounded in public reasoning and human capabilities.
-
E.
Law, Legislation and Liberty
Law, Legislation and Liberty is a three-volume work by economist and philosopher Friedrich Hayek that develops his theory of a liberal constitutional order grounded in the rule of law and spontaneous market processes.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (44)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
book
ⓘ
jurisprudential treatise ⓘ non-fiction work ⓘ |
| author |
Benjamin N. Cardozo
ⓘ
linked to:
Justice Benjamin N. Cardozo
Benjamin Nathan Cardozo ⓘ
linked to:
Justice Benjamin N. Cardozo
|
| countryOfOrigin |
United States
ⓘ
linked to:
United States of America
|
| describes |
logical contradictions in legal doctrine
ⓘ
tensions within legal reasoning ⓘ |
| discusses |
conflicts between legal rules and justice
ⓘ
indeterminacy in legal interpretation ⓘ interaction of precedent and principle ⓘ |
| explores |
apparent contradictions in legal rules
ⓘ
limits of formal legal reasoning ⓘ relationship between logic and law ⓘ role of judges in resolving legal paradoxes ⓘ |
| focusesOn |
judicial decision-making
ⓘ
philosophical foundations of law ⓘ the nature of legal principles ⓘ |
| genre |
jurisprudence
ⓘ
legal philosophy ⓘ |
| hasAuthorNationality | American ⓘ |
| hasAuthorOccupation |
U.S. Supreme Court Justice
ⓘ
linked to:
Supreme Court justices
jurist ⓘ |
| hasForm | essay collection ⓘ |
| hasPerspective |
analytic jurisprudence
ⓘ
pragmatic approach to law ⓘ |
| hasTitle | The Paradoxes of Legal Science ⓘ |
| influencedBy |
American legal realism
ⓘ
linked to:
legal realism
common law tradition ⓘ |
| intendedAudience |
judges
ⓘ
law students ⓘ legal scholars ⓘ |
| language | English ⓘ |
| legalDomain | common law ⓘ |
| mainSubject |
jurisprudence
ⓘ
legal doctrine ⓘ legal reasoning ⓘ philosophy of law ⓘ |
| notableFor |
analysis of paradoxes in legal thought
ⓘ
influence on 20th-century American jurisprudence ⓘ |
| philosophicalTradition | Anglo-American legal philosophy ⓘ |
| publicationYear | 1928 ⓘ |
| relatedWork | The Nature of the Judicial Process ⓘ |
| timePeriod | early 20th century ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: The Paradoxes of Legal Science Description of subject: The Paradoxes of Legal Science is a 1928 jurisprudential treatise by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Benjamin N. Cardozo that explores the philosophical tensions and logical contradictions within legal reasoning and doctrine.
Referenced by (3)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.