Triple

T9885391
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Fifth Appellate District E180917 entity
Predicate proceduralRole P65172 FINISHED
Object reviews records from trial courts rather than taking new evidence — LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: reviews records from trial courts rather than taking new evidence | Statement: [Fifth Appellate District, proceduralRole, reviews records from trial courts rather than taking new evidence]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: proceduralRole
Context triple: [Fifth Appellate District, proceduralRole, reviews records from trial courts rather than taking new evidence]
  • A. hasProceduralRole chosen
    Indicates that an entity participates in a process or procedure by fulfilling a specific functional role within that process.
  • B. plannedRole
    Indicates that an entity is expected or intended to assume a particular role or function in a planned or future context.
  • C. carriedOutRole
    Indicates that an entity performed or fulfilled a specific role in the context of an activity, event, or process.
  • D. possibleRole
    Indicates that an entity is capable of or eligible to serve in a particular role or function in a given context.
  • E. designedRole
    Indicates that one entity has been created, configured, or intended to serve a particular function, purpose, or role in relation to another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca828082cc8190a40f8d299caa6545 completed March 30, 2026, 2:02 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cdb45659748190a3ebd1abe23c8779 completed April 2, 2026, 12:12 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cd1d810ed48190a252b70e9390c8f3 completed April 1, 2026, 1:28 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:38 p.m.