Triple
T9771367
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Peacock Room |
E237130
|
entity |
| Predicate | associatedWith |
P37
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Frederick Richards Leyland–James McNeill Whistler dispute
The Frederick Richards Leyland–James McNeill Whistler dispute was a famous late-19th-century conflict between the artist and his patron over the cost and unauthorized transformation of the Peacock Room, which damaged their relationship and became a landmark case in artist-patron tensions.
|
E820088
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (4 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Frederick Richards Leyland–James McNeill Whistler dispute | Statement: [Peacock Room, associatedWith, Frederick Richards Leyland–James McNeill Whistler dispute]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Frederick Richards Leyland–James McNeill Whistler dispute Context triple: [Peacock Room, associatedWith, Frederick Richards Leyland–James McNeill Whistler dispute]
-
A.
Ruskin v. Whistler libel case
The Ruskin v. Whistler libel case was an 1878 British lawsuit in which American-born artist James McNeill Whistler sued influential critic John Ruskin for defamation over a harsh review of his painting, highlighting tensions between avant-garde art and traditional criticism.
-
B.
S.S. Wimbledon case
The S.S. Wimbledon case was a landmark 1923 decision of the Permanent Court of International Justice that clarified the limits of state sovereignty under international treaty obligations, particularly regarding freedom of navigation through the Kiel Canal.
-
C.
Walsh v Lonsdale
Walsh v Lonsdale is an English contract and property law case that established the principle that equity regards as done that which ought to be done, allowing equitable leases to be treated as if they were legal leases.
-
D.
Campbell Case controversy
The Campbell Case controversy was a 1924 British political scandal over the prosecution of a communist newspaper editor that undermined public and parliamentary support for Ramsay MacDonald's first Labour government.
-
E.
Temple–Bentley controversy
The Temple–Bentley controversy was a late 17th-century scholarly dispute over the authenticity and dating of classical texts that became a focal point in the broader quarrel between Ancients and Moderns in English literary culture.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Frederick Richards Leyland–James McNeill Whistler dispute Triple: [Peacock Room, associatedWith, Frederick Richards Leyland–James McNeill Whistler dispute]
Generated description
The Frederick Richards Leyland–James McNeill Whistler dispute was a famous late-19th-century conflict between the artist and his patron over the cost and unauthorized transformation of the Peacock Room, which damaged their relationship and became a landmark case in artist-patron tensions.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Frederick Richards Leyland–James McNeill Whistler dispute Target entity description: The Frederick Richards Leyland–James McNeill Whistler dispute was a famous late-19th-century conflict between the artist and his patron over the cost and unauthorized transformation of the Peacock Room, which damaged their relationship and became a landmark case in artist-patron tensions.
-
A.
Ruskin v. Whistler libel case
The Ruskin v. Whistler libel case was an 1878 British lawsuit in which American-born artist James McNeill Whistler sued influential critic John Ruskin for defamation over a harsh review of his painting, highlighting tensions between avant-garde art and traditional criticism.
-
B.
S.S. Wimbledon case
The S.S. Wimbledon case was a landmark 1923 decision of the Permanent Court of International Justice that clarified the limits of state sovereignty under international treaty obligations, particularly regarding freedom of navigation through the Kiel Canal.
-
C.
Walsh v Lonsdale
Walsh v Lonsdale is an English contract and property law case that established the principle that equity regards as done that which ought to be done, allowing equitable leases to be treated as if they were legal leases.
-
D.
Campbell Case controversy
The Campbell Case controversy was a 1924 British political scandal over the prosecution of a communist newspaper editor that undermined public and parliamentary support for Ramsay MacDonald's first Labour government.
-
E.
Temple–Bentley controversy
The Temple–Bentley controversy was a late 17th-century scholarly dispute over the authenticity and dating of classical texts that became a focal point in the broader quarrel between Ancients and Moderns in English literary culture.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca84d831b8819090322686b47887ce |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:12 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cda0f329148190a5e531478bc18073 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 10:49 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d1bd0cae548190a2d9b42ea4ecc372 |
completed | April 5, 2026, 1:38 a.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69d1be4f81cc819093a80da4025ccc5d |
completed | April 5, 2026, 1:43 a.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69d1beda84d4819089eb9f33824f1c35 |
completed | April 5, 2026, 1:46 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:26 p.m.