Triple
T9746841
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Jesús T. Piñero |
E236331
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalStatusContext |
P2132
|
FINISHED |
| Object | unincorporated territory of the United States |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: unincorporated territory of the United States | Statement: [Jesús T. Piñero, legalStatusContext, unincorporated territory of the United States]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalStatusContext Context triple: [Jesús T. Piñero, legalStatusContext, unincorporated territory of the United States]
-
A.
legalStatusAtIssue
Indicates that the legal status of an entity is the central subject of dispute, consideration, or determination in a legal context.
-
B.
legalStatusClarifiedBy
Indicates that the legal status of something is defined, explained, or resolved by a specific document, decision, or authoritative act.
-
C.
legalStatusNote
Indicates a note or comment that provides additional information or clarification about the legal status of something.
-
D.
legalContext
chosen
Indicates that the relationship or action occurs within, is shaped by, or is relevant to a specific legal framework, proceeding, or set of legal norms.
-
E.
usedLegalStatus
Indicates that one entity applies or relies on the legal status or classification of another entity in a given context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca84d3e24481908a476e2231123cf9 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:12 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cd9f677830819096d388b9c798ecd5 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 10:42 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cd03cc128c81908b84ef224f858b4e |
completed | April 1, 2026, 11:38 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:23 p.m.