Triple
T9672599
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Interstate 214 (unused number) |
E234064
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasOfficialMapping |
P89549
|
FINISHED |
| Object | no |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: no | Statement: [Interstate 214 (unused number), hasOfficialMapping, no]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasOfficialMapping Context triple: [Interstate 214 (unused number), hasOfficialMapping, no]
-
A.
hasOfficial
Indicates that an entity is formally associated with, represented by, or served by a designated official or office-holder.
-
B.
hasMappingProperty
Indicates that there exists a defined correspondence or association between elements of one set, structure, or representation and elements of another.
-
C.
hasMapType
Indicates that one entity is associated with a specific type or category of map.
-
D.
hasOfficialUse
Indicates that something is used in an authorized or formally recognized capacity, typically by an official body or for official purposes.
-
E.
hasMapReference
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific map or map location reference.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca848f55e48190b3f67252571c3d45 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:11 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cd9c6aa01c819083fc758470096ec2 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 10:30 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ccd5b5d40c8190850ad7a351445f32 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 8:22 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69ccd9408c848190b84dd74d87f76273 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 8:37 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:15 p.m.