Triple
T9651571
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gaskiers glaciation |
E233346
|
entity |
| Predicate | climaticContext |
P32804
|
FINISHED |
| Object | global cooling event |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: global cooling event | Statement: [Gaskiers glaciation, climaticContext, global cooling event]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: climaticContext Context triple: [Gaskiers glaciation, climaticContext, global cooling event]
-
A.
hasClimateContext
chosen
Indicates that something is associated with, influenced by, or relevant to climate-related conditions, factors, or considerations.
-
B.
climaticChallenge
Indicates a relationship where an entity faces, contributes to, or is affected by significant difficulties or stresses arising from climate or weather conditions.
-
C.
climatologicalSignificance
Indicates the degree to which something is important, influential, or relevant within the context of climate or long-term weather patterns.
-
D.
climatologicalType
Indicates the classification of a climate or weather pattern that characterizes a place, period, or condition.
-
E.
hasClimate
Indicates that an entity possesses or is characterized by a particular type of climate or climatic conditions.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca848b31648190b57aa55da20285be |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:11 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cd9bb0cce88190b7eacc8b43450d7f |
completed | April 1, 2026, 10:26 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ccd5b0263081908cf6df3eb07d71b0 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 8:22 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:13 p.m.