Triple
T9607495
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action (dissent on affirmative action) |
E232007
|
entity |
| Predicate | jurisprudentialTheme |
P28367
|
FINISHED |
| Object | protection of minority political participation |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: protection of minority political participation | Statement: [Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action (dissent on affirmative action), jurisprudentialTheme, protection of minority political participation]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: jurisprudentialTheme Context triple: [Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action (dissent on affirmative action), jurisprudentialTheme, protection of minority political participation]
-
A.
legalPhilosophy
Indicates the philosophical principles, theories, or viewpoints that underpin or guide a legal system, doctrine, or interpretation.
-
B.
jurisprudenceDiscussedIn
chosen
Indicates that a topic, issue, or principle of jurisprudence is examined, analyzed, or debated within a particular document, discussion, or source.
-
C.
primaryJurisprudentialSchool
Indicates the main school of legal or jurisprudential thought with which an entity is affiliated or that it primarily follows.
-
D.
legalDoctrine
Indicates that one legal principle, rule, or theory is being applied, referenced, or relied upon as an authoritative basis for interpreting or deciding a legal issue.
-
E.
hasLawTheme
Indicates that something is related to, concerned with, or thematically focused on law or legal matters.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca8485a90c819094fe40b42fde9d70 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:11 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cd9a62372881908bf21be91e7285fb |
completed | April 1, 2026, 10:21 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ccd5a6fd2481908efd131e207b8143 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 8:21 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:08 p.m.