Triple
T9607451
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Utah v. Strieff |
E232006
|
entity |
| Predicate | kaganDissentTheme |
P89216
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Argued that the majority opinion misapplied the attenuation doctrine and undermined the deterrent purpose of the exclusionary rule. |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Argued that the majority opinion misapplied the attenuation doctrine and undermined the deterrent purpose of the exclusionary rule. | Statement: [Utah v. Strieff, kaganDissentTheme, Argued that the majority opinion misapplied the attenuation doctrine and undermined the deterrent purpose of the exclusionary rule.]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: kaganDissentTheme Context triple: [Utah v. Strieff, kaganDissentTheme, Argued that the majority opinion misapplied the attenuation doctrine and undermined the deterrent purpose of the exclusionary rule.]
-
A.
hasDissentType
Indicates that a particular dissent is classified as belonging to a specific type or category of dissent.
-
B.
penaltyForDissent
Indicates that some form of punishment or negative consequence is imposed on an entity as a result of expressing disagreement, opposition, or nonconformity.
-
C.
dissentingJustice
Indicates that a particular justice disagrees with the majority opinion or decision in a legal case.
-
D.
dissentingVoteBy
Indicates that a particular vote was cast in opposition to the majority or prevailing decision by a specific entity.
-
E.
hasDissentingJustice
Indicates that within a judicial decision or ruling, there exists at least one justice who formally disagrees with the majority opinion.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca8485a90c819094fe40b42fde9d70 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:11 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cd9a62372881908bf21be91e7285fb |
completed | April 1, 2026, 10:21 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ccd5a6fd2481908efd131e207b8143 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 8:21 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69ccd93fc45c8190a823305e461e581d |
completed | April 1, 2026, 8:37 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:08 p.m.