Triple
T9607449
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Utah v. Strieff |
E232006
|
entity |
| Predicate | sotomayorDissentNotableFeature |
P89214
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Discussed the lived experience of police encounters and systemic racial disparities in policing. |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Discussed the lived experience of police encounters and systemic racial disparities in policing. | Statement: [Utah v. Strieff, sotomayorDissentNotableFeature, Discussed the lived experience of police encounters and systemic racial disparities in policing.]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: sotomayorDissentNotableFeature Context triple: [Utah v. Strieff, sotomayorDissentNotableFeature, Discussed the lived experience of police encounters and systemic racial disparities in policing.]
-
A.
hasDissentingJustice
Indicates that within a judicial decision or ruling, there exists at least one justice who formally disagrees with the majority opinion.
-
B.
dissentingJustice
Indicates that a particular justice disagrees with the majority opinion or decision in a legal case.
-
C.
standardDiscussedInDissent
Indicates that a particular legal standard is examined or addressed within the dissenting opinion of a judicial decision.
-
D.
dissentingOpinionConcern
Indicates that one party holds a differing or opposing view and expresses concern or disagreement regarding another party’s position, decision, or statement.
-
E.
dissentingJusticesCount
Indicates the number of justices who formally disagreed with the majority opinion in a judicial decision.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca8485a90c819094fe40b42fde9d70 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:11 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cd9a62372881908bf21be91e7285fb |
completed | April 1, 2026, 10:21 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ccd5a6fd2481908efd131e207b8143 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 8:21 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69ccd93fc45c8190a823305e461e581d |
completed | April 1, 2026, 8:37 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:08 p.m.