Triple
T9607444
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Utah v. Strieff |
E232006
|
entity |
| Predicate | impactOnExclusionaryRule |
P66320
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Narrowed the circumstances in which evidence must be suppressed after an unlawful stop. |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Narrowed the circumstances in which evidence must be suppressed after an unlawful stop. | Statement: [Utah v. Strieff, impactOnExclusionaryRule, Narrowed the circumstances in which evidence must be suppressed after an unlawful stop.]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: impactOnExclusionaryRule Context triple: [Utah v. Strieff, impactOnExclusionaryRule, Narrowed the circumstances in which evidence must be suppressed after an unlawful stop.]
-
A.
limitsExclusionaryRule
chosen
Indicates that a legal doctrine, decision, or rule restricts the scope or application of the exclusionary rule in evidentiary proceedings.
-
B.
impactOnLawEnforcement
Indicates the effect or consequences that something has on law enforcement activities, operations, or effectiveness.
-
C.
impactOnLaw
Indicates the effect or influence that one entity, event, or action has on laws, legal rules, or the legal system.
-
D.
courtInfluence
Indicates that one party exerts or holds influence over decisions, outcomes, or behavior within a court or judicial setting.
-
E.
influencedCourtDecision
Indicates that one entity had an effect on or contributed to the outcome of a court’s decision regarding another entity or matter.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca8485a90c819094fe40b42fde9d70 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:11 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cd9a62372881908bf21be91e7285fb |
completed | April 1, 2026, 10:21 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ccd5a6fd2481908efd131e207b8143 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 8:21 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:08 p.m.