Triple
T9586058
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Saint Maurice |
E231292
|
entity |
| Predicate | ethnicityInTradition |
P89951
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Egyptian |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Egyptian | Statement: [Saint Maurice, ethnicityInTradition, Egyptian]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: ethnicityInTradition Context triple: [Saint Maurice, ethnicityInTradition, Egyptian]
-
A.
culturalTradition
Indicates a relationship where certain practices, beliefs, or customs are recognized as part of a shared cultural heritage passed down within a group or society.
-
B.
holderEthnicity
Indicates the ethnic background or group to which the holder of something (e.g., a document, account, or item) belongs.
-
C.
sharesEthnicity
Indicates that two entities belong to the same ethnic group or share the same ethnic background.
-
D.
traditionsMaintainedBy
Indicates that certain traditions are preserved, upheld, or continued in practice by a particular entity.
-
E.
languageTraditions
Indicates that there is a relationship between entities involving the customs, practices, and conventions associated with the use, preservation, or transmission of a particular language.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca848161688190a68d514a0a9d5129 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:11 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cd99edc2c08190b67b40f6214d46f1 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 10:19 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ccd59fd7408190b36831902e3f37f7 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 8:21 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69ccd93e90048190a2b0d7c5c195ba98 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 8:37 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:06 p.m.