Triple

T9551043
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Pearic languages E230420 entity
Predicate speakerPopulation P36744 FINISHED
Object very small — LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: very small | Statement: [Pearic languages, speakerPopulation, very small]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: speakerPopulation
Context triple: [Pearic languages, speakerPopulation, very small]
  • A. haveSpeakerPopulation chosen
    Indicates that an entity has a specified number or population size of people who speak a particular language.
  • B. typicalNumberOfVoices
    Indicates the usual or characteristic number of distinct voices or parts involved in performing or realizing something (such as a musical work or texture).
  • C. speakerNumber
    Indicates the number of distinct speakers involved in a given speech, dialogue, or conversational instance.
  • D. peopleCountDescriptor
    Indicates how the number of people involved in a situation, group, or context is characterized or described.
  • E. speakerType
    Indicates the role or category of a participant in a communicative act (e.g., narrator, quoted speaker, system voice) within a given context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca847d3be8819099c9dad2a7e786f1 completed March 30, 2026, 2:11 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cd991df7308190a56d95f195627513 completed April 1, 2026, 10:15 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ccd58bd21881908b860e3ee469af13 completed April 1, 2026, 8:21 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:02 p.m.