Triple

T9478627
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Human Rights Review Tribunal of New Zealand E228576 entity
Predicate hearsClaimsOn P88348 FINISHED
Object human rights — LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: human rights | Statement: [Human Rights Review Tribunal of New Zealand, hearsClaimsOn, human rights]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hearsClaimsOn
Context triple: [Human Rights Review Tribunal of New Zealand, hearsClaimsOn, human rights]
  • A. hasClaimOn
    Indicates that one entity holds a right, entitlement, or demand over another entity or its resources.
  • B. hearsFrom
    Indicates that one entity receives information, communication, or a message from another entity.
  • C. claimsToBe
    Indicates that one entity asserts or declares itself to have a particular identity, role, or property, regardless of whether this assertion is true.
  • D. hears
    Indicates that one entity perceives or detects sounds produced by another entity or source.
  • E. hearsCasesAgainst
    Indicates that one party (typically a judicial body or official) formally listens to and considers legal cases brought against another party.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca84730a5081908de282651019bf2f completed March 30, 2026, 2:10 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cd8014fd0c819093bd15816f3db357 completed April 1, 2026, 8:29 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cca561e6b0819090aa795f3c3a2083 completed April 1, 2026, 4:56 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69cca89d0f0c8190b4528990fe708fca completed April 1, 2026, 5:09 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:54 p.m.