Triple
T9470054
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 4900 Colours |
E228366
|
entity |
| Predicate | canBeReconfigured |
P88292
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [4900 Colours, canBeReconfigured, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canBeReconfigured Context triple: [4900 Colours, canBeReconfigured, true]
-
A.
reconfigurability
Indicates the capability of something to be rearranged, adapted, or modified into different configurations or functional setups.
-
B.
canBeReorganizedBy
Indicates that one entity has the ability or authority to rearrange, restructure, or otherwise reorganize another entity.
-
C.
canBe
Indicates that one entity has the potential, permission, or capability to become, perform as, or be classified as another entity.
-
D.
canBeReconstituted
Indicates that something has the capacity to be restored or returned to a prior or functional state, typically after being separated, dissolved, or broken down.
-
E.
canBeAdaptedBy
Indicates that one entity is capable of being modified, adjusted, or tailored for use by another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca846fee388190a6ec273fd644b88b |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:10 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cd7fe0c26c8190b17c4dd9d1d8410c |
completed | April 1, 2026, 8:28 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cca55f01b081908dc0f12eaa45f832 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 4:55 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69cca89d0f0c8190b4528990fe708fca |
completed | April 1, 2026, 5:09 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:53 p.m.