Triple
T9463110
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Septimia Zenobia |
E228198
|
entity |
| Predicate | assertedIndependence |
P60610
|
FINISHED |
| Object | from Roman authority |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: from Roman authority | Statement: [Septimia Zenobia, assertedIndependence, from Roman authority]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: assertedIndependence Context triple: [Septimia Zenobia, assertedIndependence, from Roman authority]
-
A.
independenceProvedBy
Indicates that the independence of something (such as a statement, axiom, or system) is established or demonstrated by a particular proof, method, or agent.
-
B.
independenceFrom
Indicates that one entity is not controlled, governed, or significantly influenced by another entity.
-
C.
politicalIndependenceClaim
chosen
Indicates a claim or assertion that an entity is or should be politically independent from another governing authority or jurisdiction.
-
D.
hasIndependence
Indicates that an entity possesses or has achieved political, legal, or functional independence from another controlling authority.
-
E.
independenceGranted
Indicates that one entity has formally conferred political or operational autonomy to another entity, ending or reducing prior control or dependency.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca846fee388190a6ec273fd644b88b |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:10 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cd7fcd9794819093c392489d4efbe9 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 8:27 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cca55caaa8819089c5138e014892d3 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 4:55 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:53 p.m.