Triple

T9461601
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Waigali E228157 entity
Predicate documentationLanguageOf P42636 FINISHED
Object local ethnographic knowledge — LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: local ethnographic knowledge | Statement: [Waigali, documentationLanguageOf, local ethnographic knowledge]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: documentationLanguageOf
Context triple: [Waigali, documentationLanguageOf, local ethnographic knowledge]
  • A. languageOfDocumentation chosen
    Indicates the language in which the documentation for an entity is written or provided.
  • B. languageOfCommunications
    Indicates that a specified language is used as the medium for communications associated with an entity or interaction.
  • C. governingLanguage
    Indicates the language that holds official or authoritative status over a given entity, such as a region, organization, or document.
  • D. languageProvision
    Indicates that one entity supplies, supports, or makes available a particular language (or set of languages) for use by another entity.
  • E. derivationLanguage
    Indicates the language from which something (such as a word, term, or expression) is derived.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca843b123881909b0e60028475d12d completed March 30, 2026, 2:10 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cd7fcc8b1881908aa6ee13ab195330 completed April 1, 2026, 8:27 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cca55caaa8819089c5138e014892d3 completed April 1, 2026, 4:55 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:52 p.m.