Triple

T9461368
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Seyhun E228152 entity
Predicate historicalNameIn P2834 FINISHED
Object Islamic sources — LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Islamic sources | Statement: [Seyhun, historicalNameIn, Islamic sources]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: historicalNameIn
Context triple: [Seyhun, historicalNameIn, Islamic sources]
  • A. historicalNameType
    Indicates that the relationship specifies the type or category of a historical name associated with an entity.
  • B. regionHistoricalName
    Indicates that a region has been known by a particular historical name during some past period.
  • C. historicallyRecognizedAs
    Indicates that an entity has been acknowledged or designated under a particular name, status, or role during a past historical period.
  • D. historicallyIn
    Indicates that one entity existed, occurred, or was situated within the historical context, period, or jurisdiction associated with another entity.
  • E. historicallyBorneBy chosen
    Indicates that an entity has carried, possessed, or used another entity (such as a name, title, or symbol) at some point in the past.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca843b123881909b0e60028475d12d completed March 30, 2026, 2:10 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cd7fcc8b1881908aa6ee13ab195330 completed April 1, 2026, 8:27 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cca55caaa8819089c5138e014892d3 completed April 1, 2026, 4:55 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:52 p.m.