Triple

T9443711
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Hassaniya Arabic E227709 entity
Predicate statusInMauritania P88222 FINISHED
Object de facto national lingua franca — LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: de facto national lingua franca | Statement: [Hassaniya Arabic, statusInMauritania, de facto national lingua franca]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: statusInMauritania
Context triple: [Hassaniya Arabic, statusInMauritania, de facto national lingua franca]
  • A. statusInMali
    Indicates the legal, social, or official condition or standing that an entity holds within the context of Mali.
  • B. statusInBurkinaFaso
    Indicates the legal, social, or official condition or standing that an entity has within the context of Burkina Faso.
  • C. statusInNamibia
    Indicates that an entity holds a particular legal, social, or operational status within the context or jurisdiction of Namibia.
  • D. scriptStatusInMorocco
    Indicates the status or condition of a script as it exists or is used within the context of Morocco.
  • E. statusInEgypt
    Indicates the legal, social, or official condition or standing that an entity holds specifically within the context of Egypt.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca843884488190ad6cbe0153088234 completed March 30, 2026, 2:10 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cd7f3171248190b92ab990371e63f5 completed April 1, 2026, 8:25 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cca5596ffc819097e9c8eefd4ef9b8 completed April 1, 2026, 4:55 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69cca89d0f0c8190b4528990fe708fca completed April 1, 2026, 5:09 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:51 p.m.