Triple
T9432430
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Bishop of Dunwich |
E227414
|
entity |
| Predicate | episcopalSee |
P2276
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Dunwich |
E299687
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Dunwich | Statement: [Bishop of Dunwich, episcopalSee, Dunwich]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Dunwich Context triple: [Bishop of Dunwich, episcopalSee, Dunwich]
-
A.
Dunwich
chosen
Dunwich is a small coastal village in Suffolk, England, historically significant as a once-thriving medieval port largely lost to the sea through coastal erosion.
-
B.
Dunwich
Dunwich is a fictional, decaying rural village in H. P. Lovecraft’s Cthulhu Mythos, best known as the eerie setting of the story “The Dunwich Horror.”
-
C.
Innsmouth
Innsmouth is a fictional, decaying New England seaport town in H. P. Lovecraft’s horror fiction, notorious for its sinister cults and inhuman inhabitants.
-
D.
Lovecraft, Massachusetts
Lovecraft, Massachusetts is a fictional New England town that serves as the eerie, supernatural backdrop for the comic series "Locke & Key."
-
E.
Wereham
Wereham is a small rural village in Norfolk, England, known for its historic church and traditional village green.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca8437a7ac81908651de48f2d2141d |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:09 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cd7e6059bc8190a7e98aef3caabd0b |
completed | April 1, 2026, 8:21 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d1104033c08190a3670b017bd984d5 |
completed | April 4, 2026, 1:21 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:49 p.m.