Triple

T9431816
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Expa E227394 entity
Predicate hasFounderBackgroundIn P34789 FINISHED
Object technology entrepreneurship — LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: technology entrepreneurship | Statement: [Expa, hasFounderBackgroundIn, technology entrepreneurship]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasFounderBackgroundIn
Context triple: [Expa, hasFounderBackgroundIn, technology entrepreneurship]
  • A. hasFounderBackground chosen
    Indicates that an entity has a founder whose background (such as experience, education, or prior roles) matches a specified profile or characteristic.
  • B. hasFamilyBackgroundIn
    Indicates that an entity comes from, or is associated with, a particular familial or ancestral background.
  • C. hasAuthorBackgroundIn
    Indicates that an author possesses a particular background, such as education, experience, or expertise, in a specified field or domain.
  • D. hasTypicalFounder
    Indicates that an entity is commonly or characteristically founded or established by a particular type of founder.
  • E. hasParentCompanyFounder
    Indicates that an entity is the founder of the parent company of another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca8437a7ac81908651de48f2d2141d completed March 30, 2026, 2:09 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cd7e6059bc8190a7e98aef3caabd0b completed April 1, 2026, 8:21 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cca55548488190b171ae695a3212de completed April 1, 2026, 4:55 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:49 p.m.