Triple

T9431236
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject The Duke and Duchess E227378 entity
Predicate thematicFunction P88866 FINISHED
Object satirize aristocratic cruelty — LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: satirize aristocratic cruelty | Statement: [The Duke and Duchess, thematicFunction, satirize aristocratic cruelty]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: thematicFunction
Context triple: [The Duke and Duchess, thematicFunction, satirize aristocratic cruelty]
  • A. thematicConcept
    Indicates that one entity embodies, expresses, or is centrally concerned with a particular underlying theme or conceptual idea represented by the other entity.
  • B. themeFor
    Indicates that something serves as the central subject, topic, or focus for another thing (such as an event, work, or activity).
  • C. themedAs
    Indicates that something is characterized, styled, or organized according to a particular theme or motif.
  • D. thematicArea
    Indicates the subject or item is associated with, or falls under, a particular thematic area or topic of focus.
  • E. thematicMaterial
    Indicates that one entity serves as the primary recurring idea, motif, or thematic content that is developed or referenced by another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca8437a7ac81908651de48f2d2141d completed March 30, 2026, 2:09 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cd7e5ed7408190beda5fb078e9345a completed April 1, 2026, 8:21 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cca55548488190b171ae695a3212de completed April 1, 2026, 4:55 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69cca89b3368819087a3d69270c1f185 completed April 1, 2026, 5:09 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:49 p.m.