Triple
T9391728
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Rhapsody in Blue |
E226040
|
entity |
| Predicate | styleFusion |
P50934
|
FINISHED |
| Object | blend of classical music and jazz |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: blend of classical music and jazz | Statement: [Rhapsody in Blue, styleFusion, blend of classical music and jazz]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: styleFusion Context triple: [Rhapsody in Blue, styleFusion, blend of classical music and jazz]
-
A.
stylingTool
Indicates a tool or instrument used to style, shape, or arrange something (typically hair, clothing, or design elements).
-
B.
stylingFeature
Indicates a visual or design-related characteristic applied to an entity, such as formatting, layout, or aesthetic treatment.
-
C.
styleTendsTo
Indicates that one style is generally inclined or likely to develop, appear, or be adopted in the direction of another style.
-
D.
styleInFull
Indicates that something is presented, written, or expressed in its complete, unabbreviated, or fully detailed form.
-
E.
styleCombination
chosen
Indicates a relationship where multiple styles are combined or coordinated to form a unified stylistic configuration or presentation.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca842f7e3481908bf5bcf52e032dbd |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:09 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cd510eae0c8190b7c4ab487a366bb3 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 5:08 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cca545b2448190a4297312e39c21ac |
completed | April 1, 2026, 4:55 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:45 p.m.