Triple
T9389429
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Decreto Constitucional para la Libertad de la América Mexicana |
E225986
|
entity |
| Predicate | carácterJurídico |
P76736
|
FINISHED |
| Object | no llegó a aplicarse plenamente |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: no llegó a aplicarse plenamente | Statement: [Decreto Constitucional para la Libertad de la América Mexicana, carácterJurídico, no llegó a aplicarse plenamente]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: carácterJurídico Context triple: [Decreto Constitucional para la Libertad de la América Mexicana, carácterJurídico, no llegó a aplicarse plenamente]
-
A.
legalCharacterization
Indicates how an action, event, or situation is classified or characterized under a specific legal framework or set of laws.
-
B.
juridicalCategory
chosen
Indicates the legal classification or status under which an entity or relationship is formally recognized in a juridical system.
-
C.
lawCharacteristicInText
Indicates that a specific legal characteristic or feature is expressed, described, or referenced within a given text.
-
D.
legalSubject
Indicates that an entity is the bearer of legal rights, duties, or responsibilities within a legal relationship or context.
-
E.
legalDoctrine
Indicates that one legal principle, rule, or theory is being applied, referenced, or relied upon as an authoritative basis for interpreting or deciding a legal issue.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca842f7e3481908bf5bcf52e032dbd |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:09 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cd50d83c188190925c389dff1341b0 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 5:07 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cca53bd6ec81909bf403ce304e5c08 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 4:55 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:45 p.m.