Triple

T9351265
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Fort McHenry Tunnel E225022 entity
Predicate hasHazardousMaterialsRestrictions P88093 FINISHED
Object yes — LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Fort McHenry Tunnel, hasHazardousMaterialsRestrictions, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasHazardousMaterialsRestrictions
Context triple: [Fort McHenry Tunnel, hasHazardousMaterialsRestrictions, yes]
  • A. hazmatSupport
    Indicates that one entity provides hazardous materials (hazmat) response or support services to another entity or situation.
  • B. hasHealthWarningOnPackaging
    Indicates that an item’s packaging displays a health-related warning message or symbol.
  • C. hasHazardLevel
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specified degree or category of risk or danger.
  • D. hasCustomsReportingRequirement
    Indicates that an entity is obligated to report certain activities, goods, or transactions to customs authorities in accordance with applicable regulations.
  • E. hasNotableHazard
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a significant risk, danger, or harmful condition that is noteworthy or exceptional.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca842abfd48190949d71c3b86eeba8 completed March 30, 2026, 2:09 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cd4f9248c08190a7bb40feec2eb217 completed April 1, 2026, 5:02 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cc7a68ab9481909f97cb70764697cc completed April 1, 2026, 1:52 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69cc955a38108190b602d1e73725f11b completed April 1, 2026, 3:47 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:41 p.m.