Triple

T9299885
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Battle of Quebec (1690) E223730 entity
Predicate frenchAim P87945 FINISHED
Object to defend New France from English invasion — LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: to defend New France from English invasion | Statement: [Battle of Quebec (1690), frenchAim, to defend New France from English invasion]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: frenchAim
Context triple: [Battle of Quebec (1690), frenchAim, to defend New France from English invasion]
  • A. FrenchObjective
    Indicates that an entity serves as the goal, target, or object of an action or relation specifically within a French linguistic or contextual framework.
  • B. FrenchCommander
    Indicates that an entity serves as a military commander associated with France.
  • C. aimingMethod
    Indicates the technique or approach used to direct or aim an action, object, or effect toward a target.
  • D. FrenchOutcome
    Indicates that an event, action, or process results in an outcome that is specifically French in nature, context, or origin.
  • E. FrenchOperation
    Indicates an operation, mission, or activity that is conducted by, under the authority of, or primarily involving France or French entities.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca8423edb08190bc0c91287a484768 completed March 30, 2026, 2:09 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cd08d070c881908bed41aada6f85ae completed April 1, 2026, noon
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cc7a5ef1908190bc5ca166bb895af6 completed April 1, 2026, 1:52 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69cc95597be081908ece2491dd2f0f74 completed April 1, 2026, 3:47 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:36 p.m.