Triple

T929843
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Red Cross emblem E20064 entity
Predicate misuseCanConstitute P21521 FINISHED
Object violation of international humanitarian law — LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: violation of international humanitarian law | Statement: [Red Cross emblem, misuseCanConstitute, violation of international humanitarian law]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: misuseCanConstitute
Context triple: [Red Cross emblem, misuseCanConstitute, violation of international humanitarian law]
  • A. misappliedAs
    Indicates that something has been used, interpreted, or assigned in an incorrect, inappropriate, or unintended way.
  • B. eligibleUses
    Indicates the types of actions, purposes, or contexts in which something is permitted or qualified to be used.
  • C. canUse
    Indicates that one entity has the ability, permission, or suitability to make use of another entity or resource.
  • D. isCriminalizedIn
    Indicates that a specific behavior, action, or condition is prohibited and subject to legal penalties within a particular jurisdiction or legal system.
  • E. useCriminalizedUnderGagLaw
    Indicates that the act of using something is treated as a criminal offense under a specific gag law or speech-restricting legal provision.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a493af3dc48190adb7263e6e445ea1 completed March 1, 2026, 7:29 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4b349b3d0819090c58b4fb60c6a1b completed March 1, 2026, 9:44 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4b29876348190a29f4ff9878074a5 completed March 1, 2026, 9:41 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a4b2f4e3fc81908c8a2d1fbef9c5d2 completed March 1, 2026, 9:43 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:40 p.m.