Triple
T9297118
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Castelnuovo–Mumford regularity |
E223664
|
entity |
| Predicate | studiedIn |
P770
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Lazarsfeld’s Positivity in Algebraic Geometry
Lazarsfeld’s *Positivity in Algebraic Geometry* is a two-volume monograph that serves as a standard modern reference on the theory of positivity for line bundles and divisors in algebraic geometry, integrating techniques from cohomology, vanishing theorems, and birational geometry.
|
E790525
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (4 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Lazarsfeld’s Positivity in Algebraic Geometry | Statement: [Castelnuovo–Mumford regularity, studiedIn, Lazarsfeld’s Positivity in Algebraic Geometry]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Lazarsfeld’s Positivity in Algebraic Geometry Context triple: [Castelnuovo–Mumford regularity, studiedIn, Lazarsfeld’s Positivity in Algebraic Geometry]
-
A.
Topological Methods in Algebraic Geometry
Topological Methods in Algebraic Geometry is a foundational mathematical monograph by Friedrich Hirzebruch that applies topological techniques, particularly characteristic classes and cobordism theory, to problems in algebraic geometry.
-
B.
Hodge–Riemann bilinear relations
The Hodge–Riemann bilinear relations are fundamental positivity and orthogonality conditions on the intersection form in Hodge theory that underpin results such as the hard Lefschetz theorem and the Hodge index theorem.
-
C.
Standard Conjectures on Algebraic Cycles
The Standard Conjectures on Algebraic Cycles are a set of deep, still unproven hypotheses in algebraic geometry that aim to provide a foundational theory of algebraic cycles and their cohomological properties, underpinning much of the modern theory of motives.
-
D.
Chevalley’s theorem in algebraic geometry
Chevalley’s theorem in algebraic geometry is a fundamental result stating that the image of a morphism of finite type between schemes (or varieties) is a constructible set, playing a key role in understanding how geometric properties behave under mappings.
-
E.
Brill–Noether theory
Brill–Noether theory is a branch of algebraic geometry that studies linear series on algebraic curves, particularly the existence and dimension of spaces of special divisors and maps to projective spaces.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Lazarsfeld’s Positivity in Algebraic Geometry Triple: [Castelnuovo–Mumford regularity, studiedIn, Lazarsfeld’s Positivity in Algebraic Geometry]
Generated description
Lazarsfeld’s *Positivity in Algebraic Geometry* is a two-volume monograph that serves as a standard modern reference on the theory of positivity for line bundles and divisors in algebraic geometry, integrating techniques from cohomology, vanishing theorems, and birational geometry.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Lazarsfeld’s Positivity in Algebraic Geometry Target entity description: Lazarsfeld’s *Positivity in Algebraic Geometry* is a two-volume monograph that serves as a standard modern reference on the theory of positivity for line bundles and divisors in algebraic geometry, integrating techniques from cohomology, vanishing theorems, and birational geometry.
-
A.
Topological Methods in Algebraic Geometry
Topological Methods in Algebraic Geometry is a foundational mathematical monograph by Friedrich Hirzebruch that applies topological techniques, particularly characteristic classes and cobordism theory, to problems in algebraic geometry.
-
B.
Hodge–Riemann bilinear relations
The Hodge–Riemann bilinear relations are fundamental positivity and orthogonality conditions on the intersection form in Hodge theory that underpin results such as the hard Lefschetz theorem and the Hodge index theorem.
-
C.
Standard Conjectures on Algebraic Cycles
The Standard Conjectures on Algebraic Cycles are a set of deep, still unproven hypotheses in algebraic geometry that aim to provide a foundational theory of algebraic cycles and their cohomological properties, underpinning much of the modern theory of motives.
-
D.
Chevalley’s theorem in algebraic geometry
Chevalley’s theorem in algebraic geometry is a fundamental result stating that the image of a morphism of finite type between schemes (or varieties) is a constructible set, playing a key role in understanding how geometric properties behave under mappings.
-
E.
Brill–Noether theory
Brill–Noether theory is a branch of algebraic geometry that studies linear series on algebraic curves, particularly the existence and dimension of spaces of special divisors and maps to projective spaces.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca8423edb08190bc0c91287a484768 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:09 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cd089e3ae88190aa4181cdd85a67b8 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 11:59 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d0b251c4148190a94fafdc23a601d6 |
completed | April 4, 2026, 6:40 a.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69d0b65ea4548190b445563ac695b008 |
completed | April 4, 2026, 6:57 a.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69d0b6f504a48190878db828312e8a97 |
completed | April 4, 2026, 7 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:36 p.m.