Triple
T926969
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Judge Danforth |
E20004
|
entity |
| Predicate | moralStance |
P4934
|
FINISHED |
| Object | believes the court is infallible |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: believes the court is infallible | Statement: [Judge Danforth, moralStance, believes the court is infallible]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: moralStance Context triple: [Judge Danforth, moralStance, believes the court is infallible]
-
A.
moralImplication
Indicates that one situation, action, or state of affairs entails or suggests a particular moral judgment, obligation, or ethical consequence.
-
B.
ethicalDebate
Indicates a relationship where parties are engaged in discussing, questioning, or disputing the moral rightness or wrongness of actions, policies, or principles.
-
C.
positionOnEthics
chosen
Indicates a stance, viewpoint, or opinion that an entity holds regarding ethical principles, issues, or practices.
-
D.
policyStance
Indicates the position or viewpoint an entity holds regarding a specific policy or set of policies.
-
E.
philosophicalPositionExpressed
Indicates that an entity articulates, endorses, or otherwise conveys a specific philosophical stance, view, or doctrine.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a493af3dc48190adb7263e6e445ea1 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:29 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4b388f0bc8190a087222636135ba5 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9:45 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4b2970a4c8190b22cb2fd4706f62b |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9:41 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:40 p.m.