Triple

T9248726
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Makey Makey Classic E222262 entity
Predicate languageFreeInteraction P7055 FINISHED
Object yes — LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Makey Makey Classic, languageFreeInteraction, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: languageFreeInteraction
Context triple: [Makey Makey Classic, languageFreeInteraction, yes]
  • A. interactionWithHumans
    Indicates a relationship where an entity engages in some form of contact, communication, or mutual influence with humans.
  • B. languagesSpoken
    Indicates that an entity is able to communicate using one or more specified languages.
  • C. lessMutuallyIntelligibleThan
    Indicates that the level of mutual intelligibility between one pair of languages (or language varieties) is lower than that between another pair.
  • D. dialogueWith
    Indicates that two entities are engaged in a mutual conversational exchange or dialogue with each other.
  • E. languageNeutral chosen
    Indicates that the relationship or action is independent of any specific natural language, applying uniformly across different linguistic contexts.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca841d2b18819089f9faf5b2c2aec0 completed March 30, 2026, 2:09 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cd05f6d62c8190a1e33f1854767b47 completed April 1, 2026, 11:48 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cc7a4e79e48190b3200247f4624867 completed April 1, 2026, 1:52 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:31 p.m.