Triple
T9201579
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hayley Sings |
E220852
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasArrangementStyle |
P46737
|
FINISHED |
| Object | big band-style interpretations |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: big band-style interpretations | Statement: [Hayley Sings, hasArrangementStyle, big band-style interpretations]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasArrangementStyle Context triple: [Hayley Sings, hasArrangementStyle, big band-style interpretations]
-
A.
hasArrangement
Indicates that one entity possesses, follows, or is organized according to a particular configuration, setup, or ordering defined by another entity.
-
B.
hasArrangementFor
Indicates that one entity has an established plan, setup, or provision in place to accommodate, support, or serve another entity or purpose.
-
C.
isArrangementOf
Indicates that one entity is a specific ordering or configuration of the components or elements of another entity.
-
D.
arrangementType
chosen
Indicates the specific kind or category of arrangement that characterizes how the related entities are organized or structured in relation to each other.
-
E.
hasContractStyle
Indicates that one entity is associated with or characterized by a particular contract style or contractual format.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca83e8e9248190862cf3e41693b310 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:08 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ccd9429b448190a078e9cdfedd4918 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 8:37 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cc660af2408190ae06eb8326e1c64e |
completed | April 1, 2026, 12:25 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:25 p.m.