Triple

T9195978
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Guilford County E220708 entity
Predicate contains P35 FINISHED
Object Gibsonville E174940 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Gibsonville | Statement: [Guilford County, contains, Gibsonville]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Gibsonville
Context triple: [Guilford County, contains, Gibsonville]
  • A. Gibsonville, North Carolina chosen
    Gibsonville, North Carolina is a small town in the Piedmont region that spans Alamance and Guilford counties and is part of the Greensboro–High Point metropolitan area.
  • B. Pittsboro
    Pittsboro is a small town in Hendricks County, Indiana, that functions as a suburban community within the greater Indianapolis region.
  • C. Roxboro
    Roxboro is a former municipality on the Island of Montreal that later became part of the borough of Pierrefonds-Roxboro.
  • D. Hendersonville
    Hendersonville is a small city in western North Carolina known for its historic downtown, apple orchards, and role as a regional cultural and commercial center.
  • E. Yanceyville, North Carolina
    Yanceyville, North Carolina is a small town in north-central North Carolina known as the governmental and administrative center of Caswell County.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca83e7ba70819088b74866d9da2c30 completed March 30, 2026, 2:08 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ccd87d6460819097234b5dd3f749b4 completed April 1, 2026, 8:34 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69d05c36d7208190a593923bad3d18e7 completed April 4, 2026, 12:32 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:25 p.m.