Triple
T9190412
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Kruklanki |
E220571
|
entity |
| Predicate | isSeatOf |
P62
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Gmina Kruklanki |
E783906
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Gmina Kruklanki | Statement: [Kruklanki, isSeatOf, Gmina Kruklanki]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Gmina Kruklanki Context triple: [Kruklanki, isSeatOf, Gmina Kruklanki]
-
A.
Gmina Kruklanki
chosen
Gmina Kruklanki is a rural administrative district in northern Poland, known for its lakes and forests in the Warmian-Masurian Voivodeship.
-
B.
Gmina Krynica-Zdrój
Gmina Krynica-Zdrój is an administrative district (gmina) in southern Poland that encompasses the spa town of Krynica-Zdrój and its surrounding areas.
-
C.
Gmina Krasocin
Gmina Krasocin is a rural administrative district in south-central Poland, located in the Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship.
-
D.
Gmina Skała
Gmina Skała is an administrative district (gmina) in southern Poland, known for encompassing parts of the scenic Ojców area and lying within the Lesser Poland Voivodeship.
-
E.
Gmina Grudusk
Gmina Grudusk is a rural administrative district in east-central Poland, situated in Ciechanów County within the Masovian Voivodeship.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca83e6d77c81909862b7afef56b1bf |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:08 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ccd5bf25c081909e651b67ef8ecc33 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 8:22 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d065d5e81c8190b6687999a87fd559 |
completed | April 4, 2026, 1:13 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:24 p.m.