Triple
T9189659
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Kisielice |
E220548
|
entity |
| Predicate | gmina |
P852
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Gmina Kisielice |
E220548
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Gmina Kisielice | Statement: [Kisielice, gmina, Gmina Kisielice]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Gmina Kisielice Context triple: [Kisielice, gmina, Gmina Kisielice]
-
A.
Gmina Kościelisko
Gmina Kościelisko is a rural administrative district in southern Poland, situated in the Tatra Mountains near Zakopane and known for its scenic landscapes and traditional highlander culture.
-
B.
Gmina Wiślica
Gmina Wiślica is a rural administrative district in south-central Poland, centered on the historic town of Wiślica and located within the Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship.
-
C.
Gmina Osiek
Gmina Osiek is a rural administrative district in south-central Poland, known for its agricultural landscape and small-town communities within the Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship.
-
D.
Gmina Osiek
Gmina Osiek is a rural administrative district in southern Poland, located in the Lesser Poland Voivodeship.
-
E.
Kisielice
chosen
Kisielice is a small town in northern Poland located within the Warmian-Masurian Voivodeship.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca83e6d77c81909862b7afef56b1bf |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:08 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ccd5bd8c5c81909d0cdbcd7410fcee |
completed | April 1, 2026, 8:22 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d065d5e81c8190b6687999a87fd559 |
completed | April 4, 2026, 1:13 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:24 p.m.