Triple
T9178955
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Pimentón de la Vera |
E220270
|
entity |
| Predicate | coloringCompound |
P60
|
FINISHED |
| Object | carotenoids |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: carotenoids | Statement: [Pimentón de la Vera, coloringCompound, carotenoids]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: coloringCompound Context triple: [Pimentón de la Vera, coloringCompound, carotenoids]
-
A.
colors
chosen
Indicates that one entity assigns, describes, or provides the color or colors of another entity.
-
B.
isColorCharged
Indicates that an entity possesses color charge, meaning it carries the type of charge associated with the strong nuclear interaction in quantum chromodynamics.
-
C.
dyeComponent
Indicates that one entity is a constituent or ingredient used to produce or formulate a dye in relation to another entity.
-
D.
colorCharge
Indicates a relationship where an entity possesses a specific quantum color charge (such as red, green, or blue) in the context of strong nuclear interactions.
-
E.
simultaneousColors
Indicates that two or more color-related events or states occur at the same time.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca83e589948190ac9907819db11ddf |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:08 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ccc25064588190856c96b229d9cd60 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 6:59 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cc66090e5881908889dc1213815626 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 12:25 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:23 p.m.