Triple
T9175217
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | HTTP/1.1 Range Requests |
E220182
|
entity |
| Predicate | definedIn |
P775
|
FINISHED |
| Object | RFC 9110 |
E39861
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RFC 9110 | Statement: [HTTP/1.1 Range Requests, definedIn, RFC 9110]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: RFC 9110 Context triple: [HTTP/1.1 Range Requests, definedIn, RFC 9110]
-
A.
RFC 9110
chosen
RFC 9110 is an IETF specification that defines the core semantics and architecture of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP).
-
B.
RFC 9111
RFC 9111 is an IETF specification that defines HTTP caching semantics, detailing how responses can be stored, reused, and validated to improve web performance and efficiency.
-
C.
RFC 9112
RFC 9112 is the IETF specification that standardizes the semantics and behavior of HTTP/1.1.
-
D.
RFC 9082
RFC 9082 is an IETF standard that specifies the HTTP-based query format and response structure for the Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP), used to access domain name and Internet number registration data.
-
E.
RFC 9113
RFC 9113 is the Internet standards document that specifies the HTTP/2 protocol, defining its framing, semantics, and operational behavior on the web.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca83e589948190ac9907819db11ddf |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:08 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ccbfa2f9708190a955bf28a4f04004 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 6:48 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d054a87f3881908bda69238d2b97ab |
completed | April 4, 2026, midnight |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:23 p.m.