Triple
T9157193
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | theological liberalism |
E219734
|
entity |
| Predicate | developsDoctrineInLightOf |
P86827
|
FINISHED |
| Object | contemporary culture |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: contemporary culture | Statement: [theological liberalism, developsDoctrineInLightOf, contemporary culture]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: developsDoctrineInLightOf Context triple: [theological liberalism, developsDoctrineInLightOf, contemporary culture]
-
A.
developedDoctrine
Indicates that one entity created, formulated, or significantly advanced a particular doctrine or set of principles.
-
B.
clarifiedDoctrineOn
Indicates that one entity has provided a more precise, authoritative, or detailed explanation of a doctrine concerning another entity.
-
C.
doctrinalTheme
Indicates that one entity concerns, expresses, or is characterized by a particular doctrinal or theological theme in relation to another.
-
D.
doctrineOf
Indicates a relationship where one entity is the doctrinal teaching, principle, or belief system associated with, derived from, or formally held by another entity.
-
E.
examinesDoctrine
Indicates that one entity critically studies, analyzes, or evaluates a particular doctrine or set of beliefs.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca83e25418819093c6503deeaf30de |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:08 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cca9d6b9ac819094efe12c1ed67ecf |
completed | April 1, 2026, 5:15 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cc6605c6808190a30d92da006206ac |
completed | April 1, 2026, 12:25 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69cc668ad3d881908a8a93a6a1d553e4 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 12:27 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:21 p.m.