Triple
T9128854
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ediacara Hills, South Australia |
E219031
|
entity |
| Predicate | preservationMode |
P40904
|
FINISHED |
| Object | sandstone impressions |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: sandstone impressions | Statement: [Ediacara Hills, South Australia, preservationMode, sandstone impressions]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: preservationMode Context triple: [Ediacara Hills, South Australia, preservationMode, sandstone impressions]
-
A.
preservationType
chosen
Indicates the method or process by which something is preserved or kept from deterioration.
-
B.
preservationFactor
Indicates the degree to which something is protected, maintained, or kept intact over time, often moderating how much change, loss, or degradation occurs.
-
C.
preservationMethod
Indicates the technique or process used to maintain, protect, or prolong the condition, quality, or usability of something over time.
-
D.
stateOfPreservation
Indicates the condition or degree to which something has been maintained, conserved, or kept intact over time.
-
E.
preservationPolicy
Indicates the rules or strategy governing how something is maintained, protected, and retained over time.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca83debfc0819095800583e97ab10f |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:08 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cca8cc85b081908ee80db0e3b7df15 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 5:10 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cc6601d77881908299d58db6e64937 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 12:25 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:18 p.m.