Triple

T9080176
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Sophia Jesty E217597 entity
Predicate legalStatusChallenged P10247 FINISHED
Object state constitutional ban on same-sex marriage in Tennessee — LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: state constitutional ban on same-sex marriage in Tennessee | Statement: [Sophia Jesty, legalStatusChallenged, state constitutional ban on same-sex marriage in Tennessee]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalStatusChallenged
Context triple: [Sophia Jesty, legalStatusChallenged, state constitutional ban on same-sex marriage in Tennessee]
  • A. stateChallenged
    Indicates that a state or condition is being questioned, disputed, or formally contested by another party.
  • B. stateActionChallenged
    Indicates that an action taken by a state (or state authority) has been formally disputed, questioned, or contested by another party.
  • C. canBeChallengedOn
    Indicates that one entity’s claim, decision, or status is open to being questioned, disputed, or formally contested by another entity.
  • D. allegedStatus
    Indicates that a particular status or condition is claimed or asserted about an entity, but has not been confirmed as true.
  • E. challengedStatute chosen
    Indicates that a particular statute or law is being contested, questioned, or disputed, typically in a legal or constitutional proceeding.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca83d7a0388190ba1af89ed7ba36f9 completed March 30, 2026, 2:08 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cc9607942c8190a21620892ce3cbe5 completed April 1, 2026, 3:50 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cc65fa79bc81908b46f05c8bba920f completed April 1, 2026, 12:25 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:13 p.m.