Triple
T9000380
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Memory Stick |
E215024
|
entity |
| Predicate | hotSwappable |
P85614
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Memory Stick, hotSwappable, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hotSwappable Context triple: [Memory Stick, hotSwappable, true]
-
A.
hardwareRebrandingAssociatedWith
Indicates a relationship where one piece of hardware is linked to the rebranding or renaming of another hardware product or line.
-
B.
powerChange
Indicates a change in the level, amount, or state of power associated with an entity over time.
-
C.
hardwareComponent
Indicates that one entity is a physical hardware part or module that is contained in, attached to, or functionally part of another hardware system or device.
-
D.
interchangeSystem
Indicates a relationship where two or more systems are connected in such a way that they can exchange or transfer items, data, or services between them.
-
E.
compatibleStand
Indicates that one entity can be properly supported or held by another entity’s stand or mounting system.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca83a12d648190b1e4fe11e8a31890 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:07 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cc6954bb1881908d004a26ba7fe360 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 12:39 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cc5edd6cb48190b4fc6d6ca0418056 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 11:55 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69cc5f6dec4081909379bd57c02a5710 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 11:57 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:05 p.m.