Triple

T8851385

Position	Surface form	Disambiguated ID	Type / Status
Subject	Cedarburg, Wisconsin	`E210645`	entity
Predicate	hasRiver	`P165`	FINISHED
Object	Cedar Creek Cedar Creek is a small river in southeastern Wisconsin that flows through the city of Cedarburg and is known for its historic mills and scenic surroundings.	`E2223255`	NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini

Instruction

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Input

Phrase: Cedar Creek | Statement: [Cedarburg, Wisconsin, hasRiver, Cedar Creek]

NEDg Description generation gpt-5.1

Instruction

Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"

Input

Entity: Cedar Creek
Triple: [Cedarburg, Wisconsin, hasRiver, Cedar Creek]

Generated description

Cedar Creek is a small river in southeastern Wisconsin that flows through the city of Cedarburg and is known for its historic mills and scenic surroundings.

Provenance (5 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step	Stage	Batch ID	Status	When
creating	Elicitation	`batch_69ca838a424c8190b1ecac115c2927e7`	completed	March 30, 2026, 2:07 p.m.
NER	Named-entity recognition	`batch_69cc60c2300c819097b1ca6ebe2f749a`	completed	April 1, 2026, 12:03 a.m.
NED1	Entity disambiguation (via context triple)	`batch_6a5c17b1afa48190a752e786b03aed69`	completed	July 19, 2026, 12:17 a.m.
NEDg	Description generation	`batch_6a5c184e26f88190874e2b17d89dd5ab`	completed	July 19, 2026, 12:20 a.m.
NED2	Entity disambiguation (via description)	`batch_6a5c187b82988190b95db244263b8035`	completed	July 19, 2026, 12:21 a.m.

Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:49 p.m.