Triple
T8702405
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Combined Maritime Forces |
E206562
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | multinational naval partnership |
C7681
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: multinational naval partnership Context triple: [Combined Maritime Forces, instanceOf, multinational naval partnership]
-
A.
multinational military forum
chosen
A multinational military forum is an organized platform where representatives from multiple countries' armed forces convene to discuss security issues, coordinate policies, share best practices, and enhance mutual understanding and cooperation.
-
B.
maritime confederation
A maritime confederation is a loose alliance of seafaring states or cities that cooperate to control trade routes, naval defense, and maritime law while retaining their political independence.
-
C.
multinational mission mechanism
A multinational mission mechanism is a structured framework of processes, agreements, and coordinating bodies that enables multiple countries or organizations to collaboratively plan, resource, and execute a shared mission across borders.
-
D.
multinational consortium
A multinational consortium is a collaborative alliance of independent organizations from multiple countries that pool resources, expertise, and risks to pursue shared objectives or large-scale projects.
-
E.
political-military alliance
A political-military alliance is a formal agreement between two or more states to coordinate their defense and foreign policies, often including mutual security guarantees and joint military planning.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca83555b6c8190abe930dd397e863b |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:06 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:34 p.m.