Triple

T38637635
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Steve Sanderson E937604 entity
Predicate usesDesignPattern P191760 FINISHED
Object Model–View–ViewModel (MVVM) LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Model–View–ViewModel (MVVM) | Statement: [Steve Sanderson, usesDesignPattern, Model–View–ViewModel (MVVM)]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesDesignPattern
Context triple: [Steve Sanderson, usesDesignPattern, Model–View–ViewModel (MVVM)]
  • A. usesDesignModel
    Indicates that one entity applies or relies on a particular design model in performing its function or defining its structure.
  • B. usedDesignFeature
    Indicates that one entity employed or incorporated a particular design feature in its creation, implementation, or functionality.
  • C. usesDesignationPattern
    Indicates that one entity applies or follows a specific designation pattern in how it names or labels something.
  • D. hasUsePattern
    Indicates a characteristic or recurring way in which something is typically used or applied.
  • E. designedForServicePattern
    Indicates that something has been created or configured specifically to support, implement, or conform to a particular service pattern.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76ed5ca3c81909288f61fbf37b359 completed May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fce7671f108190bf3ebf54339068b5 completed May 7, 2026, 7:26 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fce5b5a84c81908ac1b5b9f08d48d0 completed May 7, 2026, 7:19 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fce76669408190b1beef8899a8a5e2 completed May 7, 2026, 7:26 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:32 p.m.